The recent Supreme Court Ruling on owning a handgun

The recent Supreme Court ruling stating that a person has a right to own a hand gun and protect his home is not a ruling worthy of the Supreme Court.  IF they had said without restrictions or encumbrances, that would have been worthy of a Supreme Court Ruling.  I do wonder why they keep missing the last word in the amendment - INFRINGED.  The regulations in Washington DC and Chicago and other states and cities certainly do infringe on exercise of that right.

Chicago's antigun laws are worthless as their politicians.  These politicians are worthy of public scorn and investigation for corruption.  They have shown their proclivity for voyeurism by placing cameras all over the city to "watch" their citizens.  They do not protect their citizens, they pillage and tax everything insight.  I would have to surmise that they want the guns gone, so they can feel safe because only the criminals have guns.  The actual taxpaying public might decide to throw them out.

This 5-4 ruling makes a mockery of the Senate process to confirm Supreme Court Justices.  The progressive Candidate will LIE their way in and then show their true colors.  Anybody come to mind?  Justice Sotomyor?  Now they want to put in a Harvard Dean of law who has the same camouflage as Sotomyor.   The Republicans who are in the senate need to shoot this one down, but there are some who will not.  So this anti- constitutional harpy will get on the high courts bench and replace another anti-constitutional harpy.

We are having our own revolution and we are coming to set things right.  We are The People and we will have the government serve us.